Comments on: vSphere4 & NTFS – How To, and Why It’s A Bad Idea

By: Gigs

Gigs — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:08:15 +0000

What is described here is a “Bad Idea” for any number of reasons, the least of which is running non supported 3rd party code on your service console. Further, as you’ll see below, the kernel version ntfs-3g expects

By: Gigs

Gigs — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:08:15 +0000

By: Re: VMFS-3, How Do I Despise Thee » Yellow Bricks

Re: VMFS-3, How Do I Despise Thee » Yellow Bricks — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:55:41 +0000

[...] perfectly capable of mounting FAT32 formatted USB Devices. Hell if you want to you can even mount NTFS devices, although this is unsupported. But why take the difficult route? Why not hook your disks up to a [...]

By: professionalvmware

professionalvmware — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:18:04 +0000

I did not test Fat32 against esx3.5/esx4. Let me know if you've run into any
hiccups.

-C

By: bands

bands — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:48:15 +0000

I use FAT32. I wonders whats the difference…

By: professionalvmware

professionalvmware — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:37:06 +0000

ESX or ESXi 4?

By: tyomitch

tyomitch — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:34:06 +0000

Why doesn't our installation of vSphere 4.0 have lwp-download nor rpm?

By: Factory Automation

Factory Automation — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:03:29 +0000

So that is the error i'm dealing every time i had tried it, thanks for sharing

By: miami web designer

miami web designer — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:41:29 +0000

No wonder I got the same errors again and again. Thanks for giving my thick-skulled head a nudge, now it all makes sense!

By: Monter (facillement) du NTFS sous ESX 4 - Hypervisor.fr

Monter (facillement) du NTFS sous ESX 4 - Hypervisor.fr — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:34:28 +0000

[...] Il semble que cela soit devenu un jeu d’enfants avec ESX 4 (toujours avec ntfs-3g). var addthis_pub = ”; var addthis_language = ‘en’;var addthis_options = ‘email, favorites, digg, delicious, myspace, google, facebook, reddit, live, more’; [...]